| | | New Member
         
Group: Forum Members Last Login: 10/2/2006 9:33 PM Posts: 5, Visits: 11 |
| | Ok, I am SP2 windows XP and I wonder if I should try windows vista now or wait till a better developed beta version. Thanks |
| | | | 
Forum Moderator
         
Group: Moderators Last Login: 8/9/2008 9:55 AM Posts: 2,237, Visits: 3,998 |
| Do you have a copy of Vista? I certainly wouldn't put it on a production machine, one that is needed for work or browsing. Could leave you without a computer if things don't work right. Apparently there is not going to be a Release Candidate or Beta 2 version of Vista.
Oops, forgot to put in the link to Richie's post about Vista:
http://forum.tweaks.com/forum/Topic189370-33-1.aspx
__________________________________________________
|
| | | | New Member
         
Group: Forum Members Last Login: 10/2/2006 9:33 PM Posts: 5, Visits: 11 |
| | Thanks you for the information. And not really I mostly use my PC to play world of warcraft and design websites, also to make simple applications, but I mean worth moving from windows xp sp2? I mean if you compare it wich you like more, wich you feel works better in your pc at the moment? |
| | | | Junior Member
         
Group: Forum Members Last Login: 1/8/2008 5:52 PM Posts: 239, Visits: 994 |
| Claims abound that Vista is much better than XP and more secure. Well, the same claims were made when XP arrived on the scene. XP is a heck of lot more stable than Win98 & ME, but how secure it is remains to be fixed! I personally will not be migrating to Vista any time soon. Also, many are in for a big surprise regarding the hardware requirements need to run Vista effectively.
ya'aa'teyXP Pro SP2 - Intel D925XCV MB - P4 2.8 GHz, 800MHz FSB, 1MB L2 Cache, HTT, socket 775 - WD 36GB SATA HD - WD 250GB USB2 External HD - 2GB Crucial DDR2 PC2-4200 - Sony DRU-710A DVD±R/RW - Plextor CD-R Premium - XFX GeForce 6800 Xtreme / 256MB GDDR3 / SLI / PCI Express / Dual DVI / HDTV - Samsung 19" LCD - Antec Performance Plus SOHO server case with 430W PSU
|
| | | | 
Site Owner
         
Group: Administrators Last Login: 7/13/2008 8:04 PM Posts: 514, Visits: 809 |
| | I would argue that Vista is much more secure than XP. Microsoft has learned a lot in the last few years with all of the security related problems that the company had to deal with. As for running Vista on your primary machine, well, I am not doing that just yet. If the Feb CTP is good, I will. -Steve
|
| | | | Junior Member
         
Group: Forum Members Last Login: 1/8/2008 5:52 PM Posts: 239, Visits: 994 |
| | Steve, I'll believe it when I see it. 
ya'aa'teyXP Pro SP2 - Intel D925XCV MB - P4 2.8 GHz, 800MHz FSB, 1MB L2 Cache, HTT, socket 775 - WD 36GB SATA HD - WD 250GB USB2 External HD - 2GB Crucial DDR2 PC2-4200 - Sony DRU-710A DVD±R/RW - Plextor CD-R Premium - XFX GeForce 6800 Xtreme / 256MB GDDR3 / SLI / PCI Express / Dual DVI / HDTV - Samsung 19" LCD - Antec Performance Plus SOHO server case with 430W PSU
|
| | | | 
Site Owner
         
Group: Administrators Last Login: 7/13/2008 8:04 PM Posts: 514, Visits: 809 |
| Tecumseh (2/10/2006)
Steve, I'll believe it when I see it.  Do a search on google for Vista User Account Protection. That is one of the new security features. -Steve
|
| |
|
|