| | | 
New Member
         
Group: Forum Members Last Login: 8/6/2008 12:16 PM Posts: 50, Visits: 272 |
| USE YOUR "ADD-REMOVE" CONTROL PANEL APPLET!
This is important - as MANY 'malware/trojans' actually DO use since they realize folks do NOT regularly check this area.
IF you don't recognize a ware?
Look it up on GOOGLE (or altavista/yahoo, etc.) to find out if it is MALWARE or not, &/or IF you need it @ all (if you don't? It's "dead weight" & taking up space on your disks & slowing you down only).
APK
"I'm Reese: Sgt. TechComVN38416, assigned to protect you - Youve been TARGETTED FOR TERMINATION!" |
| | | | 
New Member
         
Group: Forum Members Last Login: 8/6/2008 12:16 PM Posts: 50, Visits: 272 |
| SECURING THE TELNET SERVICE & USER GROUPS:
And, a Mr. Markuss Jansson on his point on TELNET service (tlntsrv.exe iirc).
http://www.markusjansson.net/exp.html
Turn Telnet NTLM logings off
-> Run: telnet.exe
--> Type (and press enter): unset ntlm
He also has more on things like "EFS" (encrypting filesystem) which I omitted, & both Mr. J.'s site & the GOVERNMENT ones I note, also cover it too (or, supplement points I made with more alternatives etc.).
APK
P.S.=> I list MORE security techniques for securing telnet, here (did this years ago circa 1997-2002, & it's cited in 2001 here @ Neowin, by searching TELNET on that page) to supplement this technique:
=================================
APK "A to Z" Internet Speedup & Security Text!
=================================
http://www.neowin.net/news/main/01/11/29/a...--security-text
=================================
Which goes into that point on TELNET & many others (including more speed tuneups, services cutoffs for speed + security in DETAIL & far more also to supplement this post here)... apk
"I'm Reese: Sgt. TechComVN38416, assigned to protect you - Youve been TARGETTED FOR TERMINATION!" |
| | | | 
New Member
         
Group: Forum Members Last Login: 8/6/2008 12:16 PM Posts: 50, Visits: 272 |
| "Checks & Balances" (accuracy check of this article by "pros" (still, test for yourselves, because a simple certification doesn't a security-pro make)), Part 1
I also "took the liberty" of contacting a "security-pro" (in Don Parker of "SecurityFocus.com" fame)!
This is in regards to my outline/article/guide here, & here were HIS thoughts/opinions on its content @ this point:
**********
Hello apk,
I don't see any real downsides to what you posted. The only thing is that
you need to remember the audience that it is you are trying to reach. If
your goal was to hit the newbies as it were then you may have missed the
mark a bit. Beyond that, it looks fine to me.
--Don
**********
That's so you guys all reading here have SOME idea this stuff is SOLID, & works, & 'passes muster' with the "top geeks" (lol, no offense intended, but lacking a better expression here is all - because mere certifications do NOT an 'expert make', as in the fellow I note above, because iirc, that is ALL he has going for him afaik & to myself @ least? THIS IS NOT ENOUGH, certs are not the same as full degrees, & not by a LONG shot in this field) in the arena of computer security!
So, test for yourselves, via CIS Tool - to be sure...
--------------
Also - Do please check this page out, for even more security points:
http://csrc.nist.gov/itsec/download_WinXP_Home.html
Especially the downloadable guide for security there to supplement this one's points, it is named -> SP800-69.pdf
----
The PDF file guide above from NIST (in association w/ the U.S. Gov't. on securing PC's no less), like my guide here also?
That also lists a "6.32 Removing Malware" section as well!
So, that is in response to 'my naysayers' from various forums that cricized me for listing such a guide here!
(In fact, many of them were MS-MVP mods too no less, but many on many forums would NOT cite "why" or yield specifics I asked for as to WHY I SHOULD NOT LIST SUCH A GUIDE in this article's content... well, experts in this area appear to agree with myself, as it IS part of "securing a computer" in knowing HOW TO REMOVE INFESTATIONS, as I do, like THEY do as well!)
Anyhow/anyways - The .pdf guide from NIST either tend to reinforce my own, OR, go beyond in some cases!
E.G.->
[list]Securing wireless networks[/list]
[list]Securing MS-Office apps better[/list]
[list]Script file extensions associations with notepad.exe for instance (for safety vs. scripted attacks)[/list]
[list]More on email & webbrowser security[/list]
[list]The SIGVERIFY utility (file signature checker)[/list]
[list]Disabling unneeded accounts[/list]
That's for some things I did not cover well imo, here (OR RATHER, well enough earlier), & to supplement my guide (both have good ideas & they both work).
APK
"I'm Reese: Sgt. TechComVN38416, assigned to protect you - Youve been TARGETTED FOR TERMINATION!" |
| | | | 
New Member
         
Group: Forum Members Last Login: 8/6/2008 12:16 PM Posts: 50, Visits: 272 |
| http://img297.imageshack.us/img297/2240/52041100vo6.png

That's an example of where your score (for users on Windows XP SP #2 no less fully hotfix patched as of this date) can be @ scoring-wise, on the CIS Tool benchmark test gauge of Windows Security, after following its suggestions for security-hardening your systems.
A 90.112 score... & that was AlexStarFire's score from the 3dguru.com forums, once he applied it to his home system ("stand-alone", non-HOME or WORK-LAN system, online on the public internet), which is way, Way, WAY up from its initial default score of 46.xxx/100...

* Here is an example of a user named Thronka, who employed it to security-harden the endpoints on his LAN/WAN setup @ work, who is also enjoying it successfully as well, albeit this time, in a BUSINESS environs (as I have it as well, for both HOME standalone machine online today, & also on the job):
http://www.xtremepccentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=28430
APK
P.S.=> I hope you guys also employ it thus as well - it starts with reaching just 1 person, & then, by example? Others start to apply it also, & then things start to change "for the better", because by securing yourself, & maybe even setting up your pals & families machines' this way? You lessen the possibility of "spreading the diseases" out there online today... apk
"I'm Reese: Sgt. TechComVN38416, assigned to protect you - Youve been TARGETTED FOR TERMINATION!" |
| | | | 
New Member
         
Group: Forum Members Last Login: 8/6/2008 12:16 PM Posts: 50, Visits: 272 |
| To all interested/reading:
I think this is it guys, I know of NO MORE to secure a Windows System... & again - IF any of you have ponits to add, please do so, but, I only ask that you keep it @ a technical computer security level (per my 1st initial post here's "P.S." section @ its termination).

* ENJOY A FASTER & SAFER Windows based system of modern variety (2000/XP/Server 2003 & even VISTA) online today (especially TODAY!)...
APK
P.S.=> In other words, please - no "grammar & spelling" English "writing style" critiques, as they do NOT help to secure a system further... I did try to keep it as SHORT as possible, & to have folks use the CIS Tool to help make it easier + more fun. HOWEVER, @ times, the material is complex & I could not "shorten/condense it" anymore w/ out losing critical details & such! Please bear with that much, & gain by this thread by getting those 90++ scores on CIS Tool, surfing safely & F A S T E R online as a bonus once you apply the points I layered ontop of CIS Tool's guidance points (based on "industry best practices" & such)... thanks! apk
"I'm Reese: Sgt. TechComVN38416, assigned to protect you - Youve been TARGETTED FOR TERMINATION!" |
| | | | 
New Member
         
Group: Forum Members Last Login: 8/6/2008 12:16 PM Posts: 50, Visits: 272 |
| More security tools/info. (04/28/2008), for APPLICATION LEVEL SECURITY:
(I.E.-> For checking for apps you have that may be security vulnerable OR have been patched vs. said vulnerabilities, etc.):
----
SECUNIA PSI (checks for outdated OR apps that are known to be insecure):

https://psi.secunia.com/
NEW VERSION (released very recently too).
A good program, by a trusted & WELL-KNOWN security-oriented website online (I tried version 1 earlier on last year, it needed work. This one is solid though, so far @ least, imo!)
(It works, & sometimes catches things FILEHIPPO UPDATE CHECKER below, won't - good "2nd Doctor's opinion" etc.)
----
FileHippo's Update Checker (checks for outdated OR apps that are known to be insecure, supplement's PSI above):

http://filehippo.com/updatechecker/
Decent program as well, & good to use as a supplement to the SECUNIA PSI Tool as well (from a well-known file downloads site also in filehippo).
(It works, & sometimes catches things SECUNIA PSI above, won't - good "2nd Doctor's opinion" etc.)
----
Windows Vulnerability Scanner:

http://www.pspl.com/download/winvulscan.htm
Nice program for checking Microsoft Operating Systems &/or Ms-Office versions vs. missing security patches, & it works, very well!
----
APK Registry Cleaning Engine 2002++ SR-7:

http://www1.techpowerup.com//downloads/389/foowhatevermakesgooglehappy.html

* Yes, "shameless plug" on MY part on the last one, but, it does have "security benefits"...
(& more than potentially useful forensics ones, because it shows you what files a user calls upon via its lists (it does check recently used filelists, but, will also list those files the user attempted to delete (this assumes he may have been attempting to hide them)))... it is 100% proven SAFE on all 32-bit versions of Windows (see its description & feedback by users on the download page) 9x-VISTA as well)).
APK
"I'm Reese: Sgt. TechComVN38416, assigned to protect you - Youve been TARGETTED FOR TERMINATION!" |
| | | | 
New Member
         
Group: Forum Members Last Login: 8/6/2008 12:16 PM Posts: 50, Visits: 272 |
| A great site that Mr. Dancho Danchev "turned me onto", for making additions to your CUSTOM HOSTS FILE (mentioned earlier on in this guide in STEP # 5) via his security blog... how/why?
http://mtc.sri.com/

* Well - it keeps an updated listing of sites & servers that are KNOWN TO BE MALICIOUS!
APK
"I'm Reese: Sgt. TechComVN38416, assigned to protect you - Youve been TARGETTED FOR TERMINATION!" |
| | | | | |
|